AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR GOVERNMENT versus CH. KHADIM HUSSAIN
A. Twelfth, the applicant of the Supreme Court under R3 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VII of 197 VII), Section X42 (2) of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Supreme Court Rules, 1978 IO XI, R3. Appeal for leave was required to appeal. List four copies of his application for leave to appeal, with the lower court filing the judgment registered against him and other necessary copies of the petitioner who wishes to avail himself of the appeal. Must obtain copies in person or in your name. Through their approved lawyer or agent who may also be their lawyer. If he was appointed by the applicant in accordance with the law before applying for leave to appeal to the applicant, in the present case he would have to obtain copies in his own name, and he, on behalf of any such lawyer, Can also benefit from a law-provided facility to include a lawyer or agent. In the absence of a motive petition, it was stated that the Supreme Court was unable to uphold the essential rules of the rule and was obliged to reject it.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
