Find a Lawyer

ZULFIQAR ALI versus STATE

Definitions of Sections 2302 (b) and 8458 were neither named nor given the details of the accused in the FIR, nor did the FIR mention any of the nine injured persons. I was not done, nor were eyewitnesses explained it. The ocular testimony and, medical evidence, supported the fact that there were no eyewitness testimony at the time of the incident, no crime was left unattended, the recovery of a licensed pistol from the accused could not proceed in the prosecution case. Identity without any free association Identification parade was not enough to maintain his conviction Prosecution case was met with suspicion The accused was acquitted registration advocate from Nawab Shah lawyer