NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN THROUGH ZONAL HEAD AND CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY versus MESSRS SURAJ GHEE INDUSTRIES LIMITED
Sections 9 and 10 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), VIII, R11 Bank Debt Recovery Claimant's decision not to apply for leave to appear and defend this suit VI VII, R 11, CPC Was rejected under. , Without first deciding the application, the validity banking court did not adopt the procedure listed in the Banking Companies (Loans, Progress, Credit and Finance) Act 1997, and the law went beyond the scope of the provisions of the banking courts, It was created and established under special law, was the creator of that law and was bound by the provisions and procedures prescribed under the special law, without deciding the leave application, Was not given the option to dismiss or dismiss the lawsuit. (4) Read with the Banking Companies Section 10 (Loans, Progress, Credit and Finance) Act 1997, and they overlooked the procedure set out for the Banking Court High Court, a decision passed by the Banking Court The matter was remanded to the Banking Court to allow the first case to be appealed for decision to appear on leave and request to defend the case.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
