MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus STATE
Section 498 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 392/411 pre-arrest guarantee, FIR grant was filed with delay of one month and sixteen days and motorcycle theft before FIR complainant was registered Was privately recovered. , The prosecution's witnesses and the alleged victim appeared before the court and agreed that they were satisfied that it was not the accused who committed the alleged offense and that he had entered his oath with a request for bail in the case. Owner of the same name, the invoice has already appeared before the trial in this regard. Nothing could be recovered from the court or the accused at such a stage, sending the suspects behind bars could not serve any purpose. Depending on the position of the complainant and other witnesses, the trial involves the defendant's initial conviction for a reason other than that. , Cannot be denied considering the accused's authorized ad interim arrest warrant was already verified
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Shujabad lawyer