ZAFAR AWAN, ADVOCATE versus THE DISTRICT/SESSIONS JUDGE, CHAKWAL
Section 302/324/148/149 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Sections 9 (1) and 190 (2) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Appeals Session Judge Transferring a Case from One Sessions Division to Another Sessions Division Moved to The Punjab Government had constituted the Jurisdiction Talgang as a Sessions Division through a notification issued under Section 9 (1), CCPC, on November 8, 1995, and an additional District and District Judge was presently appointed to be a session judge in Talagang. The session judge was appointed. Thus, the magistrate had to send the matter to the Sessions Judge of Tala Gung and not to the Sessions Judge; the district headquarters at Chakwal-challan did not legally send the CRP session to the Sessions Division on the mandate of section 190 (2). had gone. Therefore, the Talking Session Judge Chakwal does not have the option of withdrawing the case from the Additional Sessions Judge, Talgang's file, and transferring the matter to the Additional Sessions Judge Chakwal's file for disposal. Consequently, the order of the session judge was declared without any legal authority and was set aside accordingly the magistrate was sent to the court of Additional Sessions Judge Talagang, constituted under section 9 (1), 5 190 CR Invoice was directed to the PC mandate. ), CR PC
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
