Find a Lawyer

FOZIA KHANAM versus AISHA SILACHI

Article 5 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition Applicant had demanded in the question of the authority under which the respondents were appointed to the post of question, the order of the accused was illegal, invalid and without any The jurisdiction, which was born for the examination, was the first question as to whether the applicant could claim the position in question in the matter of truth and whether he could request equal jurisdiction of the High Court. Or pass the test or pass the test will not give you the right to claim the appointment to a particular position, unless That the appointing authority would not pass anything The order petitioner, who was not appointed, was the respondent of a particular post, who was posted to the post that was posted, belonged to the same area and was a resident of the same place where the relevant school Had no legal right to claim the appointment, while the applicant resided 25 miles from this place and was not a resident of the area authority during the appointment, the respondents on the post in question had given their permanent residence. Given the weight at the place where it was said that the school is located, the applicant could not be considered for the above post, If the candidates are from the same area / space, responder, in the circumstances, it was entitled to have the edge over other candidates illegally or jurisdiction irregularity or error was not applicable in the absence petition best law firm from Quaidabad lawyer