Find a Lawyer

SHAMREZ KHAN versus STATE

One of the allegations against the accused was to appreciate the evidence of Sections 9 (A III), 10 (2), 25 and 32 of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 409, 420, 467, 471, 477 A & 109. He was a lawyer, a fugitive accused of causing a wheat shortage as a contractor, the trial court allegedly responsible for the alleged wheat shortage. The contractor was alleged to be dealing with the contractor in any way, no reference or report was filed under section7373, the government suffered a wheat shortage by a well-known co-accused contractor. It was discovered by the court that he is a lawyer of attorney in favor of the accused if he is not proved by the law, therefore he cannot be controlled. The accountability of an accused was indeed a praiseworthy motive, But searching must adhere strictly to the principles of transparency and natural justice. n Yet one was not registered and the accused was not proved against the bargaining which was accepted by the chairman, keeping the National Accountability Bureau in view of the circumstances of the case and the interest of justice of the trial court. Should have been approved by. On the same terms and conditions that led to the dismissal of the plea bargain, the National Accountability Bureau High Court approved the request and directed that the application disqualify the accused after complying with the terms and conditions of the transaction. The clause will be released. Stay tuned best law firms from Lalamusa lawyer