Find a Lawyer

BIBI FEROZA versus ABDUL MALIK

Section 5 and Schedule Gardens and Wards Act (VIII of 1890), Section 21 and 19 Majority Act (IX of 1875), Section 3 Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), XXXXI, RR 1 and 3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The marriage agreement with the father of the constitutional applicants (minor woman) was implemented in which it was agreed that they would hand over their daughters to their sons in the marriage while the applicant's brother as long as the family The petitioner filed a claim that on the basis of the said agreement, the defendant was presenting as her husband but she did not want to marry him and thus the defendant Leah stopped presenting herself because her husband's suit was sentenced by the family. It was overruled by a minority-based court but the appellate court. A suit was filed for the simplicity of the marriage in which the defendant claimed to be the husband of the applicant on the basis of the agreement, the marriage was admitted on the admission of the marriage between the parties' parents, in the absence of which The contract had no sanction in the eyes of the law because the defendant was presenting herself as a husband, without the Nika Family Court, they have rightly found that the contract is not binding on the applicant and the appellate court has made it a minority. Made a mistake in reversing the family court's finding on the basis of the legality of the marriage offer The defendants had no right to it. Apply yourself as the husband of the applicant principles us immigration advocates from Kacha Khooh lawyer