Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY, LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, LAHOR

Section 92 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Recall Motion Applicant, the Deputy Councilor of the Union Council, had sought an action against him, which was approved by the House of Union Council. As an outlaw. They were started without the fulfillment of the essential provisions of Section 92 of the Punjab Local Government Ordinance 2001, which included the lack of notice and the right to address it in the House. Respondents operating the antitrust motion had submitted that an unknown resolution could be declared invalid and reversed. Live, which can be instructed to return to the House where the applicant will have the right to face such a case. Such offer of respondents was acceptable to the applicant; the person who does not trust the House should not remain as the elected official. Unanimous agreement between the parties, the constitutional petition filed by the petitioner was accepted and the motion against the applicant approved Rika's resolution was rejected and non-existent, resulting in the suspension of the respondents' memorandum. Shall be considered and presented to all members of the Union Council in the House after the notice for voting and other formal proceedings. lawer from fb area from Bunner lawyer