CHARTERED BANK, SHARE QUAID-I-AZAM, LAHORE THROUGH MR. T.H. BOKHARI, ATTORNEY OF THE BANK versus M. Y. MALIK & COMPANY THROUGH MANAGING PARTNER
Section 6 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OVIII, Rr 6 and 7 suits, damages for stock based on defendant's claim for recovery of loan amount, illicit use and tampering Based on a claim from And the bank got more money in the mortgaged account, it was in the custody of the promised stock bank and it was controlled by a warehouse The defendant's witnesses testified that at the time of delivery, some stocks were less. While the rest of the stock was damaged by replacement. And the loss was due to the negligence of the bank as the receipt of the stock stock delivery showed that the stock provided to the defendant was damaged and the short bank in its letter acknowledged the loss to the mortgage stock, according to the bank's testimony. Accordingly, the defendant noted the loss The defendant's witness statement regarding overpayment to the delivery bank remained intact during its interim investigation. Evidence on the record shows that the defendant suffered business loss, through a bank letter that the defendant demanded compensation from the bank. The defendant was awarded the circumstance
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
