Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ARIF versus STATE

Sections 302 (b), 324 and 34 of the evidence were reported by the police almost two hours after the incident; the complainant was not a resident of the house where the incident occurred, but was a resident of the place Was 15 acres away. The police did not name any of the complainants in their first statement as the accused complainant admitted that there was no light source at this place, the witness also admitted that the accused was from the same village and He was aware of it before. Injured witnesses confessed before the trial court that they had gone to the police station before going to the hospital, but the police did not record any witnesses statement that day and their statements were recorded for the first time 24 Can't be charged later in the day. Identity was not paraded despite the fact that unknown assailants were mentioned in the FIR at the time of the incident, they did not use the spot and firearms on the suspect's identification, however, In the absence of expert information and firearms not introduced to the expert motive were not sent, the trial was denied by the complainant, the prosecution witness and the accused were residents of the same village and for the complainant. Was known, but their names were not mentioned in the FIR. The record was introduced as Mr. fire arms expert report was not available even though no crime kalyyan were recovered from the crime scene. Tent in a trial court established by the prosecution and by the trial court family advocate from Kallat lawyer