STATE versus MAQSOOD AHMAD
Section 8080/1111/8458 Criminal Code of Conduct (V-18898), Rule 43535/9439 Defining Evidence, Increasing the Prosecution By a Testimony of the Prosecutors' Witnesses Without a Doubting, And recovered the accused and their accomplices. Other prosecution witnesses confirmed the complainant's statement, the defendant's recovery was another contentious piece of evidence against the accused, named in the FIR and identified at the time of the incident. , Two co-accused who were not named in the FIR, had already earned it. Convicted of the offense by both courts, a criminal theory of crime was a felony, the offender was punished and punished, the extremity of justice was not fulfilled, three years RI was increased to seven years RI under section 458, P. The sentence of the PC penalty and the imprisonment in lieu of the same shall be the same as the trial court had granted and the appellate court will confirm the sentence and the accused were punished under section 808080, PPC will not plead with the fine. And it was set aside and the accused were acquitted under section 808080, PPC amendments dealt with such amendments to the extent of punishment.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near North Wazirstan lawyer