Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SIKIANDAR HAYAT KHAN versus SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER


Article 185 (3) The application for leave to appeal on the basis of the agreement was in relation to the distribution of the allotted cinema to the predecessor in the interests of the parties on the basis of the dispute, the date of which the basic order of the allotment was passed on 13 12 12 1971 Was filed under which the petitioner, as well as his brothers' interest, was admitted on a petition filed jointly by the professional applicants, never challenged by the applicant. Was not done - professional forum professionals from any forum were exempted from this order and the constitutional petition The air. The High Court had settled on a settlement between the heritage of the Allies, the correctness the High Court had given the defendant's claim for good reason. High Court refuses to interfere in High Court order

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
ask a advocate free from Chiniot lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.