Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHOAIB versus GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, D.I. KHAN AND OTHERS

Section 4 Removal of employees from unlawful appointments on which government employees were hired was not publicized, nor was a merit list made when government employees were replaced and government employees were replaced. Removed from employment Government employees did not have exceptional education Career and metric exams had slightly more than 50 percent marks, appeal against dismissal by service tribunal was dismissed. It was unbelievable that no youth could manage to get a better grade in the entire North West Frontier Province. Government employees who were appointed to the positions of question were not best available to serve government employees, the province and the country, as such appointments have led to serious public and country rights. As a result, they were deprived of their rights and were subjected to unlawful exercise of civilian appointments. In the process of appointing civil servants, another silenced victim was subjected to torture involving youths who could be better qualified. As a result, they were more deserving and able to hold positions in question, but they were denied their rights. Appointments under the question of unethical, dishonest and immoral acts which secretly and secretly led to the appointment of public servants were declared invalid and illegal not only because they were a set of laws and laws in this regard. Humiliating action was taken, not because it was a serious breach of merit and transparency, and because of this, to serve the people and the country better. law websites from Kurram Agency lawyer