ZAHOOR HUSSAIN versus PRINCIPAL OF GOVERNMENT COLLEGE, SAHIWAL
Article 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973); Article 12 ()) In the minds of the reporting officer, in the mind of the reporting officer, the prejudice service tribunal refused to remove the remarks. It is permissible if the reporting officer's bias was violated. , Could not get reports of good faith, knowledge of Islam and knowledge about ideological ideology. The power of expressing Islam, knowledge of work and analytical qualifications of a civil servant was not appreciated by an impartial reporting officer. The question of subjective evaluation was in the reporting officer's caretaker domain, which could not be intervened unless some convincing and immediate reasoning was available and there was a lack of urgent reduction in this regard. Was not included, which was in accordance with the law reached by the Punjab Service Tribunal on persuading the Supreme Court to grant leave, and on the basis of justice standards and good grounds, it did not demand any intervention. Appeal denied \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
