Find a Lawyer

MUNSHI KHAN versus KALA AND 8 OTHERS

Section 6 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), for contemplation of the pre-emption of Section 42, pre-emption of the suit, amounting to Rs. Rupees had given the verdict against the appeal on which it was charged. After the trial court recorded the evidence against the evidence on record and the trial parties determined the amount of reservations which the High Court had argued in the appeal through the pre-emptor, the facts were then decided by a reasonable decision. As well as the legal aspects of the case were considered. As determined by law, the Supreme Court's intervention in the order passed by the High Court was not guaranteed, along with the costs of sale by the trial court to the appellant within the prescribed period, as directed by the Supreme Court. Directed to deposit the consideration amount. tax advocates from Mangal Sada lawyer