Find a Lawyer

RUKHSAR AHMAD versus THE STATE

Article 133 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VII of 1974), Section 42 and the re-examination of witnesses, the testimony of the law appealed to the Supreme Court jurisdiction Article 133 (3) of 1984 also provides for the safe management of criminal justice. Was added for Even the slightest evidence presented in a criminal case needs to be considered in conjunction with other evidence to establish the opinion of an accused in a crime or a case, while in the investigation, the defense only questions such questions as the witness. Cannot be limited to inserts. The question that he mentioned in the examination in chief defense related to this matter could raise any question that could be related to a fact in a criminal matter, even in the cross examination of the witness's role. Challenges can be made, though the testimony of the law may go to trial under Article 3 133 of the 1984 1984 1984 1984. The re-examination does not introduce any new issues, but if a material question has been left in the examination of a witness, it cannot be asked as a question. The matter of right in re-examination has been acknowledged by Article 133 of the Law Evidence Act for the safe administration of criminal justice, allowing the prosecution to make such a question. The new matter was introduced in cross examination, The witness's re-examination was rightly allowed through the hearing. However, the court defense had the freedom to investigate, the witness said, did not commit any illegal acts by the trial court or the first appellate court. There is no merit in the appeal, the Supreme Court dismissed. online advocate from Chaininda lawyer