Find a Lawyer

YOUSAF KHAN versus THE STATE

Section 2 (2 (b) / evidence of testimony testimony was primarily based on the testimony of the complainant who was the victim's widow. And said that his evidence was inherently weak. The only reason his presence was negated at the time of the incident is if there was a reasonable suspicion in his mind about the occasion. In any case, it is sufficient to refute the statement of a witness because the presence of witnesses at the time of the incident was suspicious. Proof of recovery, motivation, conviction, even if it is proved, cannot in any way advance the prosecution's case and relying solely on the testimony of a single confessing confessional witness is completely unsafe. Had an affair with his wife and had alleged conduct in an alleged transaction, had been substantially suspicious, unnatural and practical. The probable event was an unexpected event, the complainant being a witness to an opportunity Was unable to calculate his presence on the spot and was unaware that the crime, on the occasion, was not present. What kind of weapon was used in the commission of No independent witnesses were cited, nor did they come forward to support the prosecution's case, despite the fact that the scope of the opportunity was a densely populated area with shops all around and the business at the same time. When the complainant also stated that he was dressed in burqa at the relevant time, while the investigating officer said lawer from fb area from Gujrat lawyer