TANVEER AHMAD KHAN versus REGISTRAR, LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE
26, 7 and 20 of the Lahore High Court Notification No. 10218 / Yards 1VZ2 (A), promoted to the post of Deputy Registrar, dated 10 7 2009, (Lahore) Appointment of High Court Appointment or Development of Authorized Authority / Chief Justice For any person / officer scope promoters / respondents promoted to the post of Deputy Registrar, (Lahore) Chief Justice Appellant, who was the reader, was dismissed from the development plans. An invalid promotion order was submitted. Any reasons to suppress it. That despite being senior in promotions, it did not develop. That no objective criteria for selection was made in the post of Deputy Registrar, therefore, this unidentified order demanded discrimination because of their better academic ability, which gave them more priority than the appellant. Under R26 (Appointment and Terms of Service) Rules of High Court Establishment, the Chief Justice of Lahore High Court had unlimited powers to promote or promote any Appellate and Promotion High Court Officer and their development shows That one of the developers and the appellant's educational qualifications are the same. , And this appellant was senior in some promotions The order failed to provide reasons why the appellant was fired for his service record and one of his promotion of educational qualifications? Promotion was selected for education when four other readers in the selection pool, who had a good education and oneligibility, were neglected, free, transparent, under the Rule 7 Code of the High Court Establishment (Terms of Service Appointment and Terms) And made of intelligent purpose
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
