Find a Lawyer

UTILITY STORES CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN versus SULTAN MAHMOOD

RR 4 and 18 (g) Removal of Service (Special Powers) Ordinance (XVII of 2000), Section 3 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Sections 2A and 4 Service Removal Audi Ultimate Partium applicability return principle, LIFO Utility Stores Corporation of Pakistan (Pvt.) Limited, without notice to its employees, removed employees from the service under the provisions of the Ordinance 2000, without prior notice, removal of employment. The service tribunal allowed the appeals filed by employees under Sections 2A and 4 of the Service Tribunals Act, 1973 and the corporation Shin instructed that the restoration taken by the corporation be directed that no removal notice be required under the Utility Stores Corporation Corporation of Pakistan (Private) Limited Service Rules, 1981 Welidity Corporation failed to prove. It was held that remuneration was required by the corporation to discourage employees from work, neither the law nor the facts were justified; the principle of LIFO was also applied to the vessel, instead of to the employees. Discrimination was treated Although the corporation's financial difficulties arose before the Supreme Court Or I was, no document to prove that despite the document. The corporation was cited for failing to make the necessary amendments to the Utility Stores Corporation of Pakistan (Private) Limited Service Rules 1981 and the current simplicity was not a matter of omission, in the judgment field of all observations made by the service tribunal. And the corporation can move forward. Against employees who suffer tax advocates from Shakargarh lawyer