Find a Lawyer

MESSRS MASOOM INDUSTRIES versus HABIB BANK LIMITED

Article 47 and AXXI, R66 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Conduct Auction Holding any auction other than the date fixed by the court for the auction, setting the auction date fixed. The executed court was 11 5 2000, while the auction took place on 13 5 2000, the complaint of the judgment was that without the decision of the objection filed by it, the executing court had taken the auction taken by the accused. Had confirmed that there were too many buyers who could not participate because of the auction on the date set by the executive court. If the auction was not reported on 11 5 2000 according to the schedule given by the Executive Court, no one had any question of the buyer's intention. Understand that this property was being auctioned on 11 2000 2000 even if such buyers would know about the court's schedule that the property would be auctioned in 5 2000, and if it did Was aware that the auction of the property by the auctioneers was going to be held on 13, 2000, even though the application for the objection was restored and the grounds for emphasizing it were taken into consideration. Gone, they were not the only grounds under the law to separate the auction itself because the auction of the property did not happen before the court date. Was made but two days later which did not adversely affect the auction proceedings, the order was approved till 1998, and the decision was of interest. Sale of property, in the current auction process, which was confirmed, by auctioneers. famous lower court advocate from Kotla Pathan lawyer