GHULAM KHAN versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB
Sections 2 (2) and 3 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Land Not Available for Transfer The disputed question of fact is whether the plaintiff's complaint was that the suit was available for transfer of land and in this case the land was not available for transfer. The related matter was pending. The notification officer at the time of issuance of the Evacuee Property and Homeless Persons (Cancellation) Act, 1975, rejected the claim of the plaintiff and the civil suit filed by him was also rejected by the trial court's decision and by the trial court. The approved order was upheld by the Appellate Court and the High Court. Settlement authorities found that this property is not available for disposal under the Property and Homelessness (Cancellation) Act, 1975, so a factual dispute regarding the role of property was resolved after the trial court came to that conclusion, Has excluded the case. The appellate court and the high court, which was further endorsed by the appellate court in the civil review, would therefore not interfere with the spray. I was denied leave to appeal the court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Jaffarabad lawyer