MUHAMMAD KHAN versus SALEHUN ALIAS SALEH MUHAMMAD
Plaintiff filed suit on 31 December 1977 in section 12 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 14 and Article 113 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) for specific performance of contract. The petition was made in connection with the sale agreement in view of the Supreme Court's observation in the petition filed by the trial court against the decision of the trial court on 8 8 1988 1988 to dismiss the decision regarding the sale of the fake plaintiff. Claim filing a specific claim for contract performance Such a request by the courts should not have been decided by forgery in the arbitration proceedings under the sale agreement, for which the plaintiff could, if desired, find a remedy on the basis of his / her defendants. The trial court's order was barred by the time trial in this case, the appellate court affirmed it and the defendant's High Court's review held that the decision was not made according to the question of limitation. Was. The following courts had mechanically proceeded on the assumption that a decision was made regarding the delay in filing a case in such an observation of the Supreme Court, while the facts of the case and the circumstances of the case. Should have been decided independently. That the arbitration proceedings face corruption, litigation cannot be prosecuted with good faith. And the evidence was sealed, but the certified copy of the arbitration proceedings in which the evidence was found shows that there was no arbitration agreement, but the courts below have dealt with the matter.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Kabir Wala lawyer