MESSRS STANDARD ENGINEERING WORKS versus WAPDA
Article 35 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition to Appeal Chairman Chairman Advisory Board Status Chairman acquitted by the Water and Power Development Authority issued by Chief Engineer (Power) Irrigation and Power Department applicants. Refused to be Prior to the request of the applicant on behalf of the Electric Inspector, the electrical inspector had accepted the application against which the authorities had appealed before the Provincial Advisory Board. During the approval of the appeal, the Chairman of the Advisory Board was exchanged and the notification was made. After the Chief Engineer (Electricity) Irrigation and Electricity Department was not transferred, the Chairman set aside the order issued by the applicant, the electrical inspector Pliya, that no order was passed after the transfer of the advisory board chairman. Because he is now Chief Engineer (Electricity) Irrigation and Moh Even the power of accuracy was not left to the Chairman of the Advisory Board of the Office of the Chief Engineer (Power), he became fnkts afydyu to serve as Chairman of the Board. These would have been successors who should have served as chairman of the board, although some hearings had taken place before the chairman's transfer, but the order had not yet been approved and no decision was announced. Yes, it was not a decision made after their transfer. Such an order was set aside by the Legal Impact Board and the appeal was sought by the Board in accordance with the law, under which the petition was granted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Kurram Agency lawyer