Find a Lawyer

ZAFAR IQBAL ALIAS KAKA versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, PATTOKI DISTRICT KASUR

11 months after the death of section 176 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199, the petition for respondent, which was the brother of the accused, section 176 (2), application under CCP. Filed The deceased's body was disposed of by a session judge for forensic testing and the cause of death of the deceased; the applicant, who was the nephew of the deceased, challenged the order of the session judge stating that The petition has been filed by the deceased's brother. A Medicaid legal report was not available to harass the applicant merely 11 months after the deceased's intentional death as the deceased's body was never sent for inspection purpose, the deceased's death certificate showed. The deceased had been ill for seven days before his death and his death. Late death was given as a heart attack, no FIR was lodged against any person for unethical death. The complainant had to emphasize his motives and also have to base it. But he was keeping his doubts about the death of the deceased once the complainant confirmed it and informed the court about the justification for the delay of 11 months. Only after the case has been registered should the police have to collect evidence for the purpose of further action, which was the order of the session judge, that the High Court cannot be prosecuted without closing the scope of dispersal, it should only be used. When the complainant succeeds in making the accusative charge after defining the delay and then moving to dispose of the body patent advocate from Haveli Lakha lawyer