Find a Lawyer

ASIF MAHMOOD versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

The arrest and detention of the accused was taken by Army authorities under Section 2 (1) (d) (i) and 73 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Articles 5, 10 (2) and 199 Constitutional Requests. According to the provisions of Article 10 (2) of the Constitution for obtaining his remand under Section 2 (1) (d) (i) of the Pakistan Army Act 1952, the accused appeared before the magistrate within 24 hours of his arrest. Was No result, under the oral order of the COA section, the arrest of the suspects was also not valid under the Pakistan Army Act. Although the accused were not declared eligible under the Pakistan Army Act by law, the matter related to the members of the Army Force was examined. The inquiry was exempted by the High Court pursuant to sub-article (3) of Article 199 of the Constitution, except where the verdict was absolute authority, without any jurisdiction or quorum unlawful accusation, even though the Army was not an officer. Was arrested under the Army. The Act and its case are covered with this bar as the result of the constitutional application contained in Article 199 (3) of the Constitution was not sustained and accordingly it was excluded. r \ n \ r \ n top advocates from Kunri lawyer