MAULANA QARI MUHAMMAD ARIF, SIALVI, DIVISIONAL KHATEEB AUQAF, GUJRANWALA versus CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR, AUQAF, PUNJAB, AIWAN-E-AUQAF, LAHORE AND 2 OTHERS
Section 4 Punjab Civil Servants Act (VIII of 1974), Section 9 General Clauses Act (X9 of 1897), Section 24A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 and 4 Constitutional Application Transfer Orders Applicants Against Non-Intervention of Public Works Presented to the authority. Its transfer order, but the authority did not decide, despite the passage of time, the applicant had to file a constitutional petition against his transfer order, it was the responsibility and responsibility of the public workers to represent their subordinates. Decide representation / appeal. Without fear, right, obligation, and within reasonable time as envisaged by Article 4 of the Constitution and Section 24A, General Clauses Act, 1897, the inaction of public officials does not punish any body. Should be given and in this case there was a violation of the exercise of powers. The law, which is to be considered for the sake of the High Court, had sufficient jurisdiction to instruct the public jurisdictions to do the hard work in accordance with Article 4 of the Constitution while the powers under Article 199 of the Constitution Authority. The parties were instructed to decide on the applicant's representation / appeal according to the law, after providing appropriate hearings to the parties.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
