Find a Lawyer

MST. SAFIA versus MST. BIBI

Arts 64, 117 and 120 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 115 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 Declaration of Relationships, following the death of the owner by the courts below to prove the harmonious conclusions of fact Owens landed the suit for proof, his widow became a limited owner The sole proprietorship of the original owner was inherited after the death of the limited owner The plaintiff claimed to be the daughter of one of the original owner's consortium. I announced the inheritance of the 1 / 8th section. The Land Trial Court dismissed the case on the ground that the plaintiff had failed to prove its relationship as mentioned in the family tree developed by the plaintiff in their decision and the decree passed by the trial court. Was upheld by the appellate court, which contained legal documentary evidence. The family tree mentioned by the plaintiff in this case was not correct, the plaintiff failed to reject the documentary evidence by presenting the documents or denied it. n Verbal testimony, to prove the contents of the custody table, based on Article of64 of the evidence of the law at 1984-1984, there must be a statement of evidence presented by the plaintiff for proof of the relationship, as stated above. Did not meet the law Sha testimony Article 198464, Pla 1984 Pla Pla The plaintiff failed to identify any irregular or illegal matter made by the following courts or misrepresented or read any evidence. The plaintiff failed to prove its relationship to the conciliation of its original owner and thus was not entitled to receive it. 1 / 8th of the land in dispute land in relation to the relationship list of supreme court advocates from Mohen Jo Daro lawyer