MESSRS SHAJAR PAK (PVT.) LIMITED, LAHORE versus ASSISTANT COLLECTOR SALES TAX AND CENTRAL EXCISES, LAHORE
Applicants to the Section & 33 & 7 penalties against the appellant were the High Court alleging that they cleared the material produced by them during various periods in the year 97 97 without paying sales tax. The appellant company failed to show through documentary evidence that the allegations made by the department were false. , Section 33 of the Sales Tax Act 1990, was found responsible for the payment of sales tax along with additional taxes and penalties provided that the Tribunal's order did not raise any question of law which the appellant referred to the High Court. Did not That it did not allow sufficient opportunity to dismiss the allegations contained in the showcase notice issued by it was not supported by such statement, even on the basis of appeal before the Tribunal, In spite of the occasions, he never failed to take part in the original proceedings and despite the fact that he was absent after H. Evans did not once raise any question of law by attending the Order's tribunal, The appeal against the order was dismissed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Lakki Marwat lawyer