MUHAMMAD SALEEM versus STATE
Section 392 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 (h) surrendering illegal arms act (XXI of 1991), definition of evidence of section 7 Of the 4 prosecution's 4 witnesses, two were convicted of a crime. The accused had returned. Their statements were excellent evidence linking the accused to the alleged commission of the crime. The prosecution's witnesses had fully confirmed each other's statements and their testimony could not be shaken despite a long cross-examination, and so far they remain credible as far as the material details of the case are concerned. ? The robbery was also recovered from the two accused, who completely linked them to the commission of the crime. All eyewitnesses, including police officers, were independent, natural, unwanted witnesses who had no background in hostility against the accused. Not even a single suggestion was made, eyewitnesses said, why they were making such accusations against the suspects that questions about falsehoods or alternatives were overturned, given the circumstances, namely, the arrest of an accused. Was caught by the hands. The recovery of the stolen money, the possession of a motorcycle and the recovery of pistol 30 bore from his possession and the recovery of the money recovered from the other accused will result in irreparable conclusion that the trial against the accused was completely proved and the trial court acquitted them. Was punished appropriately for the crime committed. The minor contradictions in the statements of witnesses by them were natural, the court had to look at the intrinsic value of the witness statements, but the inquiry agency should be motivated to approach the court despite any negligence or negligence. Natural, unseen, created by eyewitnesses
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Hangu lawyer