Find a Lawyer

AHMAD SHAFIQUE ELAHI versus SHAKEEL ANWAR

The constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 15050 law testimony (10 of 1984), Article 129 (e) East Code, paragraph 3 (d), the recruitment policy intra-court appeal Appointment of public records candidates was controversial on the basis that the authorities The services did not comply with the procedures set forth in the Code under the title of Recruitment Policy for Autonomous Bodies Corporations, objecting to the procedures adopted by the authorities at the Interview with Viva Voice Authorities. But this was the nature and different numbers were assigned to the candidates against different sections. Details of the numbers given to the candidates in the Viva Voice were presented to the Supreme Court, after the original record of the case was rejected. The High Court was remanded for reversing the verdict. The impact sheet on the Department of Interviews prepared by the authorities was a public document that was permissible in the eyes of the Rule t1150 of the Constitution, therefore, the full record was to be given to the original record, the testimony of the law Even according to the provisions, the concluding sheet was a valid document, under the constitutional jurisdiction, the 1984 judgment by the High Court was set aside, and the Division Bench of the High Court in the election made by the authorities. Intra-Court of Appeal denied, dismissed accordingly immigration advocates email from Hasilpur lawyer