MAJOR ANWAR-UL-HAQ versus STATE
The grant of a case relating to damages to the accused was a contentious matter, before the arrest of Section 498 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 489F, whether the civil suit was admitted by the accused as a confession. Considering dishonesty was a matter of further investigation when they issued the check, the rationale behind the enforcement of section 489F, was that the PPC did not immediately demand mechanical action after the banker returned the check. What, but should be used only where the purpose of issuing a check in case of repayment of the loan was dishonest and simple. The past conduct of the party was also to be seen in this regard. The old business relationship between the parties also shows that the accused was not involved in the crime for three years. Had explained his position fully, in the circumstances he was confirmed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Umer Kot lawyer
