Find a Lawyer

CAPT. (R.) MUHAMMAD SHABBIR versus MUHAMMAD IDREES

Sections 12 and 27 (b) for the specific performance of the sale agreement claimed the suit plaintiff had agreed to sell the suit to the plaintiff and after receiving the money the sale agreement was made in favor of the plaintiff. And under it the possession of the suit land was given to him. The plaintiff alleged that the plaintiff subsequently, collectively and without consideration, sold the suit to another person (defendant no. 1), and the other person claims that the sale was made by the plaintiff. No agreement was in place for the claimant's uncle. The case filed by the defendant and the plaintiff was collective and the other person (vendor) the defendant did not contest the registered cell David in the case whereby the second person (vendor) was executed by the defendant about 9 months later. Had given About 10 to 10 months after the alleged execution and trial of the sale agreement in favor of the plaintiff, the alleged settlement of the sale was not charged in the entire area which stated that the other person / shopkeeper. The plaintiff / vendor was aware of the alleged sale agreement in favor of the plaintiff's sales deal in relation to the suit land executed in favor of the person (the defendant / vendor was never questioned. Without having proven the substantial purchaser of the suit land or in this case for the sake of the allegation that the previous agreement in favor of the claimant in the meaning of this section Knew about s. 27 (b) trials of the Specific Relief Act, 1877, the appellate court below, were properly rejected. best advocate from Mian Walli lawyer