Find a Lawyer

ZESHAN SARWAR versus STATE

Section 497 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), section 380/406/420/468/471 bail, serious allegations of denial and primary fax were levied against those who misused their trust by their employers Due to which he had suffered a great financial loss to the complaining company. Just because the offense against the accused, Section 497 (1), did not attract the CRPC prohibition clause, does not mean that the accused has automatically been entitled to bail, to file an FIR. The nine-month delay was unusual, as the action against the accused allegedly began to deviate when the complainant's management allegations surfaced and it was alleged that the salaries of employees of the company were being eaten. Because the complainant had played the whole drama, it was not expected as it had a very impressive effect on a company with a business worth crores of rupees. If involved in a theater, which would eventually discredit the statements made under Section 161 itself, the CRPC was available on the record of some who claimed that the accused and his accomplices were accompanied by him. The fraud is as stated in the FIR that there was no record of the alleged heart disease of the accused, which may indicate that the accused was suffering from such illness. Disease that was not treated in jail. It is convinced that even though six months have passed since the registration of the case, the challan of the case was not presented, it did not appear to be correct because according to the investigating officer, the challan was already presented in court but there was no Not good In the request for bail, it was excluded accordingly how to become a advocate from Abbaspur lawyer