Find a Lawyer

SYED SAKHAWAT HUSSAIN SHAH versus S.H.O. POLICE STATION KALLAR SYEDAN RAWALPINDI

Section 22A & 22B of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition Petitioner's request that the applicant had the identity of the commission of the offense identified in his petition, therefore, the station house officer of his Was required to file a lawsuit. The relevant provision of the law and that its application was filed under Section 22A, CRPC, the Additional Sessions Judge instead of dismissing the Additional Sessions Judge, held that the order was between the parties. The cemetery has a land dispute. There was no identifiable offense and a report submitted by Section H was sent to the Additional Sessions Judge, who investigated the matter, had sound reasoning and should be properly respected and considered by the Sessions Judge. Was. Additional Sessions Judges exercise jurisdiction over the High Court, therefore, there is no benefit whatsoever as to whether applications should be entertained by a Sessions Judge / Additional Sessions Judge under Section 22 / B, CR PC and Again, the High Court was empowered by the High Court under Article 199 of the Constitution and in such a way that the Sessions Judge was being made baseless and that the Sessions Judges / Additional Sessions Judges be reduced to the burden of the High Court. B, the powers were granted under the CCPC but it appears to have increased the availability of appropriate treatment. In the present case, the finding of Additional Sessions Judge could not be pushed aside in case of complaint, constitutional petition dispute or thematic issue. top civil advocates from Guddu lawyer