Sections 302, 324 and 34 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (v. 1898), Section 417 (2A) Qatil-e-Aadam, Qutil Emad's attempt, the joint intention to appeal the charge against the accused and the accused against the accused (respondents): It was alleged that he killed the complainant's brother and injured his own sister due to wrong color of the incident, which later succumbed to his injury, as per the FIR's validity. It is revealed that the complainant (appellant) was not liable for any particular injury. The defendant and co-accused (defendant) complainant on the body of the victim alleged that the accused dragged his own sister and beat her, but a prosecutor's witness mentioned something about the beating by the accused. No, while another prosecution witness did not mention the fact that the accused dragged his sister and no overt act was attributed to the accused and co-accused, except the evidence of the defendant's molestation. And the prosecution witnesses involved in the participation of the defendants were physically contradictory and contrary to the version of the complainant who filed the FIR. The artifact states that the accused and co-accused were not alike, despite being armed. The commission of the alleged incident was shocked that the prosecution had failed to prove the allegation beyond any reasonable doubt, so the trial court rightly acquitted the accused and the co-accused was acquitted of the High Court. No facts or legal flaws were found in the order. The trial case, nor was it arbitrary, nor was the appeal against the injunction dismissed, in the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
