MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE, ISLAMABAD
Arts 25 and 199 Constitutional Treaty Equalities National Judicial Policymaking Committee (NJPMC), Applicants (Employees) Recommendations Worked in different courts established under federal laws Applicants complained that they There were no benefits given to employees working under different conditions. The Provincial High Courts were getting the recommendations of the NPMC. Authorities did not deny that the establishment of the High Courts in Lahore, Sindh and Quetta was getting detailed allowances in the recommendations of the NJPMC, in which the applicants were placed in the same category with admission in which the District Judiciary Employees and high officials were put into action. The courts of the provinces are functioning and since such applicants were entitled to the same treatment, the employees of District Judiciary were benefiting from the establishment of the High Courts under the recommendations of the NJPMC but the applicants. They are also being deprived of such a violation of the authorities Article 25 of the Constitution and it was declared without legal authority. Applicants are entitled to concession under the recommendations of the NJPMC because it is authorized by the authority Was confirmed
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
