MASOOD PERVEZ SAJID versus MST. NAWASIH FATIMA
Section ???? Wives of West Pakistan Family Court Rules, 1965, R6 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Suitable for objection to jurisdiction to recover maintenance allowance and maternity costs, suit wife filed against her husband In her written statement, the family court's objection to the jurisdiction and decision of the case in favor of the wife was heard before the appellate court. Raising the object was not in his favor. An application on the principle that the parties are bound to make their pleas objected to the lack of jurisdiction of the court or tribunal should have been raised before the First Appellate Court or Tribunal, if not raised at the appropriate time. If I went, that would be it. The constitutional plea is not raised because the husband did not object to the jurisdiction over the hearing or the perpetuation of the case; he could not say that before the High Court, he exercised the constitutional jurisdiction. There is no option to hear the case and decide the constitutional petition cannot be sustained.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Bhirya Road lawyer