Find a Lawyer

MIRZA MUHAMMAD ARSHAD versus E.D.O. (R). LODHRAN

Section 8 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 and 212 Constitution Promotion Intelligence Petitioners challenged the authority order under which the respondents were juniors, promoted from the positions of patwari to the positions of kanongos and the applicants. Was disregarded and ignored on the basis of maintaining constitutional petitions on the basis that it was related to the 'terms and conditions' of a public servant in this case, and thus the service tribunal could decide. And the question of eligibility in constitutional applications relates primarily to the terms and conditions of a civil do not have. Servant, while the question of fitness due to eligibility criteria was a sarcastic assessment where it was not possible to change the opinion of a service tribunal or a court-authorized authority, where there was a question of eligibility, the service tribunal would have jurisdiction, but matters. In regards to the health question, it will not lie with the Euros Tribunal to decide on the appointment, development or promotion of a particular employee when any public employee has contested the fitness of his competitors. If you are challenged not to hold a post or to appoint a competitor, then such High Court The jurisdiction will come into force and Article 212 of the Constitution will cease to exist without the jurisdiction of the High Court and cannot be applied to this case but it has been neglected despite the applicants being unable to progress. And the juniors were also ignored. Was promoted, their case was within the limits of the determination of fitness and the jurisdiction of the service tribunal advocate from Rawala Kot lawyer