Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SARDAR versus MUHAMMAD RIAZ

AXXIII, R 3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition filed by the Settlement Processes Parties reached trial court before recording trial of their joint statement and dismissing suit in light of the agreement. The proper course for the trial court to record the parties' statements and to exclude litigation for the trial was to proceed and convince yourself that the provisions of O XXIII, R 3 CPC were considered. The legal adjustment of the case should be made under Khudzh, after which the trial court erred in misunderstanding the material facts for the decision of the trial. To which the trial court exceeded its jurisdiction in excluding both the courts. The suit of the plaintiffs' decisions and orders by the two courts below was without lawful authority and there was no legal consequence, so the plaintiff's two suits and two petitions jointly run by the parties were considered pending according to law. Will go The High Court has directed that the trial court should be satisfied with the legal adjustment of the case through compromise. Similar action shall be taken in accordance with the requirements of O XXIII, R 3 CPC and accordingly a decree shall be followed if the adjustment of the legal proceedings is not found in the trial case. Gambling can go according to the law. Accordingly criminal advocate from North Wazirstan lawyer