Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

NAEEM ARSHAD versus SUPERINTENDENT OF NEW CENTRAL JAIL, MULTAN


Section 397 Control of the Narcotic Material Stances Act (XXV of 1997), Section 9 (C) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition was proceeding against the accused in two cases simultaneously and the same day that both the cases were pronounced. The punishment should be treated simultaneously. The court tried two cases simultaneously, and in both cases, different cases were sentenced to death on the same day. The applicant / petitioner in his constitutional petition had sought direction for the treatment of punishment in both the cases and it was alleged that the crime was proved in the second case with his interval. After conducting the two cases together for four days, the trial court should have ordered the accused to run under Section 397, the PC High Court has accepted the petition and ordered that the accused be punished both. Sentences should run concurrently.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
list of advocates from Ambela lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.