SHAHBAZ AHMAD ALIAS SHAHBAZOO versus STATE
Section 2302 (b) Definition of Evidence Only one of the three prosecution witnesses, the deceased's father, appeared in the trial court and the remaining two were released because they had won any of the details of the accused in the FIR. No weapon was provided for the crime used as the FIR was on the investigating officer of the accused; in these circumstances the identification parade was made, but no such parade was conducted, in fact no evidence of it. There was no doubt, a person washed his life, but the court had to see if the prosecution proved the charges against him. Was successful in prosecuting the accused on the capital charge, which was missing in this case, the prosecutor was unable to prove his case against the accused, the benefit of the doubt was extended and he was sentenced. Gone. And the sentence filed by the trial court against him was set aside and he was acquitted of the charges against him.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Sehwan lawyer