MUHAMMAD SHAFI versus AMANAT ALI
Section 42 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 2 (D), 96, 115 and A. VIII, R11 Constitution of Pakistan (1973); Arts I & 185 and Constitution Constitution Constitution Constitution Remedy suit filed by the defendants In rejecting the jurisdiction of the review, the appellate court dismissed on the ground that the plaintiff did not disclose any reason for proceeding that this appellate court exceeded its jurisdiction. In rejecting the defendants' plea that the order denying the dismissal of the decree appeared and the constitutional petition was not applicable under which to dismiss the claimant under section 2 (d). The original jurisdiction was granted by any court using the modification court, while excluding its jurisdiction under section 115 CPC, it could not be a court exercising judicial jurisdiction. Orders passed though may not be a challenge because of the binding of the decree. On appeal of the appeal under section 116 CPC, the amending powers under section 115 CPC were handed down under a consensus, respectively, in the district court and the high court, and from the evaluation of the suit for jurisdictional purposes. Provided that, in the case of either the High Court or the District Court, it may be retained if the plaintiff rejects the High Court's jurisdiction, his appeal should go before the Supreme Court. , Subject to the constitutional requirements of Art, 185 of the Constitution, but all such orders were not appealable under Article 185 of the Constitution against the order of the plaintiff to dismiss the revision court, when the defendants reviewed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Tobatek Singh lawyer