AAMIR SHEHZAD versus STATE
Section 489F was filed in connection with the dishonesty of a special petition on the repeal of the FIR in the Special Relief Act (Constitution of 1877), Section 56 (e) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 and 4 of the Constitution. Is. The same check was filed against him by the complainant and before the registration of the anonymous FIR, the civil court issued a prohibition order in connection with the said check and the complainant's use. That the lawsuit was a retaliation for a civil suit already filed by the complainant against it. That the relevant check was issued by the applicant in favor of the complainant's brother but the same was returned to the applicant and later the said check was stolen by the complainant for the purpose of registering the FIR under question. And that the FIR was nothing but complaint by the complainant, but it was admitted that the alleged theft of the check was never reported to the police, alleged dishonesty of the relevant check Any order had already been issued. A civil court and, thus, this offense, this is anyone, was committed by the civil court before the unauthorized order was passed, keeping the information about a recognizable offense before the police Could not be stopped by. An injunction can be issued against the law Under Article 4 of the Constitution, every citizen is provided with the indispensable right to act in accordance with the law. An order prohibiting a partner from participating in a criminal investigation by a civil court or in any criminal case. e (e) such matters under the Special Relief Act, 1877
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Padidan lawyer