Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAZZAQ versus CUSTODIAN OF EVACUEE PROPERTY AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR, MUZAFFARABAD

Section 25 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), the powers of section 42 to vacate property from the authorities of the Supreme Court, to secure any evacuation under section 25 of the Pakistan Administration for Dependent Property Act, 1957. , There were unlimited security and management options. Property and he was authorized to take such measures as he deemed necessary or desirable for this purpose and to achieve any such purpose, he was given the authority to do all the work as much as he could. In this case, Custodian, in the present or in the present case, justified it by his wisdom. In order to lease the land in favor of the applicants, but on their failure to collect the lease money, it was permissible to cancel it and to order in favor of the respondents that once the administration of the vacant property was taken by Custodian Took over and passed an order regulating such property options. As withdrawals, no authority was required to issue any order in connection with this property unless a declaration was accepted or permission, as the case may be, was sought from the Custodian Administration, vacant. The protection and management of the property will include any process that ensures the protection of the vacant property that is incompatible with the lease, transfer, grant or any other method of transfer. The appellant of the provisions of the Pakistan Administration of Evacuation Property Act, 1957, believes that if the appellant's allotment was not valid, the lease should have been restored in his favor, he was equally devoid of any power as the appellant was acquitted. registration advocate from Kot Mithan lawyer