Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AYYUB versus MUZAFFAR KHAN

Section 141414al Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302 / 34A Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VII of 1974), Rs. After the release of the accused on the bail execution of the case, he was not detained by the court at trial, acting on bail under section 14 and Section 14, on bail bail. Confiscated and ordered to deposit 50,000 rupees instead of the full amount of bail, which was Rs 2 lakh Shariat Court did not agree with the trial court's order Ordered bail to deposit Rs 2 lakh, the total amount of the bond of bail, the validity trial court failed to provide any reason for the reduction in the amount of bail except that the person who was a public servant was a guarantor for the accused. , Was bound by law that if it were confiscated, he would deposit the total amount of the bond and the court ordered the government to submit it. The finance minister had to use judicial discretion in keeping with the law but in the present case the trial court Disregarded the law and arbitrarily fixed the Shariah court's money, while the entirety of the bail bond Ordered to submit Qom. list of supreme court advocates from Mir Ali lawyer