MIR FAISAL HAMID versus MRS. SHAMIM KHALID
While filing a writ petition in the High Court (Section 42 (2)), the petitioner for leave for appeal was deliberately and knowingly suppressed the fact that he participated in the test / interview with the respondents. And failed to qualify it otherwise the question of law was not included. In the petition for leave to appeal, the decision in the writ petition was considered unconstitutional as it was well-defined and time-bound by the law. Respect goes on to the principle that when filing a writ petition, deliberately conceals or suppresses material facts. N was liable to be dismissed even though the applicant may have a reasonable case or else in case of eligibility to apply for leave.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Topi lawyer
