SAMINA versus S.H.O. POLICE STATION, GHULAM ABBAD, FAISALABAD
In Article 199 constitutional petitioner, the petitioner and her husband petitioner petitioned the police officer to prevent the harassment of the accountable police officer, saying that she was important and that she herself had married her husband with her free will. And against his wishes, the volunteer police officer was referring to intimidating and harassing her and her husband and interfering in their marital life, to prevent the applicant from harassing her and her husband. Directive sought that the applicant and her husband present in the court a copy of the record of the Nika The petitioner could have entered into a free will and voluntary marriage contract as an important and suicidal couple, and in doing so he did not commit any crime. Being a police officer, they had no legal business to harass or bully or threaten. The police officer was not instructed to interfere in their peaceful marital life and force the applicant and her husband to harass or threaten her marriage.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
