MESSRS PAKISTAN STATE OIL COMPANY LTD. versus SHAUKAT MAQBOOL
Accused by the complainant or the police on suspicion of cancellation of any element of section 497 (5) and 498 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 420/468/471/409 pre-arrest bail, malaria duty or ulterior motive Was found to be falsely involved with the commission of The accused was named in the FIR, which was yet to be recovered with a special attachment; there was no case for the accused to accept pre-arrest bail, to grant him pre-arrest bail. The order was summoned, the co-accused remained confined, he remained in jail for some days and no further investigative case came out, after which he was entitled to bail after his arrest. The trial court adjourned the trial. all went out of their jurisdiction after discussing all the cases which were not within the jurisdiction of the trial court at bail, The prosecutor had sufficient material. The premise of the bail-in was only to temporarily review the evidence with the commission of the alleged crime on the premiere Connect Connect co-accused, and deep competence could not be negotiated. The offense against the co-accused fell under the prohibition clause of section 497, the special The judge's PC order was also approved by the judge to confirm the guaranteed interim arrest granted to the co-accused.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
