MUHAMMAD ASHIQ versus MUHAMMAD ASIF ZIA ALIAS BHOLA
Section 497 (5) of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), section 302/201/109/147/148 bail, the filing of the petition for FIR in the case was filed with a delay of four months and eleven days, allegedly. The murder was absent, no comment was given by the concerned doctor about the cause of the post-mortem death, in which case it was not shown whether the late death was a natural or unnatural death but his No other evidence was available on the suspect's record of the crime, except for an extra-judicial confession, the First Investigation Officer charged with the crime, the suspect and his co-accused Yes, but in the subsequent investigation, the other investigating officer took note of the accused's guilt. The investigating officer did not record the statement of any witness and failed to record the diary of a case in connection with his investigation. ? And he agreed to produce a report containing his opinion on the crime of the accused, nothing was recovered from the detention and the entire record of the investigation showed that no one was ever charged with anything of the kind. In which the accused was charged with litigation against the allegations made by the complaining party. In the case of the accused there was no chance of cancellation of the bail, the petition filed by the complainant to cancel the accused's bail was dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law websites from Kallat lawyer